Did you know that there are no national safety standards in the US
for safe levels of wireless radiation exposure, and that cell phones
were allowed for sale in the US by the FDA before any market safety
testing was done?
It is true, even though cell phones were introduced for sale more
than 20 years ago, children use them, and there are more cell phones
in use in this country than there are people. (396 million
subscribers in the US in 2016
http://www.ctia.org/the-wireless-industry/infographics-library
while the population was 323 million in 2016.) The
current FCC exposure limits are only guidelines that
the FCC has adopted from industry, and to date safety standards
have not yet been set. In the FCC’s own words, “there
is no federally developed national standard for safe levels
of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy"
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wirelessdevices-and-health-concerns
.
Decades later, this $25 million NTP
animal study is finally undergoing peer review right now.
There are 11 members of the peer
review panel evaluating the study.
On March 28, 2018, they voted whether
there was clear
evidence, some evidence, equivocal evidence, or no evidence of
carcinogenic activity from cell phone radiation in the following
areas
[GSM modulation: 3G modulation used by
AT&T and T-Mobile in the US]
CDMA modulation: 3G modulation used by
Verizon and Sprint in the US]
"Clear
Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity":
"Some Evidence of
Carcinogenic Activity":
malignant glioma in the brain
for male rats for GSM and CDMA-modulated cell phone RFR at
900 MHz
pheochromocytoma (benign,
malignant, or complex combined) in
the adrenal medulla for male rats for GSM modulated cell
phone RFR at 900 MHz
Increases in Nonneoplastic
Lesions
in the heart, brain, and
prostate gland of male rats occurred with exposures to GSM
and CDMA cell phone RFR at 900 MHz.
in
the heart, thyroid gland, and adrenal gland in female rats
occurred with exposures to GSM cell phone RFR at 900 MHz
in
the brain in females exposed to CDMA cell phone RFR at 900
MHz.
Equivocal
Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity:
fibrosarcoma, sarcoma, or malignant fibrous histiocytoma in the
skin.
alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in the lung
malignant lymphoma
hepatoblastoma in the liver
adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in the prostate
gland
benign or malignant granular
cell tumors in the brain
adenoma in the pars distalis of
the pituitary gland
pancreatic islet cell
adenoma or carcinoma (combined).
adenoma or carcinoma (combined)
in the liver
-
Please see Press Release from
Environmental Health Trust Below, and
please read this investigative
report
"Clear
Evidence of Cancer" Concludes U.S. National
Toxicology Program Expert Panel on Cell Phone
Radiation
Scientific
panel advises there is evidence for an association
between both heart and brain cancers and cell
phone radiation in large-scale animal study
Triangle
Park, NC -- (SBWIRE)
-- 03/30/2018 -- Scientists concluded there
is "clear evidence" linking cell phone
radiation to the development of cancers in rats.
The U.S. government invited an expert panel to
make a majority-rules declaration in response to
the $25 million U.S. government National
Toxicology Program (NTP) study of cell phone
radiation in animals. After a three-day review of
the study data, they voted to strengthen the
conclusions that cell phone radiation caused
health effects in the cell phone radiation
exposed rats and mice. This week Scientific
American and The
Nation both
ran stories on the topic along with The News and
Observer entitling their piece, "Can
your cellphone cause cancer? Scientists find
definitive link in study of rats."
The
peer review panel voted that the malignant
schwannoma tumors found in the heart of male rats
be scientifically categorized as "clear
evidence of carcinogenicity" and that the
malignant gliomas found in the brain of male rats
be categorized as "some evidence of
carcinogenicity." In addition, they voted
that the increased tumors of the adrenal medulla
in male rats exposed to the GSM type of cell
phone radiation be categorized as "some
evidence of carcinogenicity," adding a new
type of tumor thought to be caused by the
exposure. The expert panel advised strengthening
the conclusions regarding seven different health
effects. The panel called attention to
statistically
significant increases in an unusual pattern of
cardiomyopathy, or damage to heart tissue, in
exposed male and female rats.
The panel highlighted that in Italy a recent
animal study on
radiofrequency radiation at much lower radiation
levels than the NTP study found the same types of
rare malignancies.
In
addition to the heart and brain cancers,
statistically significant increased numbers of
tumors were found in other organs at one or more
of the exposure levels studied, including the
prostate gland, pituitary gland, adrenal gland,
liver, and pancreas.
"What
should happen now is the FDA should be immediately
working on developing a quantitative risk
assessment from this data and in the meantime the
FDA, FCC and other agencies should promote
precautionary measures for the
population—especially for children,"
said Ronald Melnick PhD, who lead the design of
the NTP study in his 28-year career as a scientist
at the National Toxicology Program. Melnick is
currently senior advisor to Environmental
Health Trust(EHT).
"Enough
is enough, how many more deaths would be needed
before serious action is taken? Evidence just
continues to accumulate. On March 28, 2018, the
external peer reviewers of the National Toxicology
Program voted to increase the level of evidence
for the causal role of radiofrequency radiation
for several tumors and other negative health
effects. It's
time for action," commented Annie Sasco MD,
DrPH, former Chief of Research Unit of
Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the
International Agency for Research on Cancer of the
World Health Organization and medical advisor to
EHT.
"The
NTP study found far more than evidence of cancer.
Animals exposed in their lifetimes to the same
amount of radiation that a human can receive in
theirs gave birth
to smaller babies with more defects in their
hearts.
What also makes these results especially
compelling is the fact that all well-designed
studies of people with 10 or more years of
exposures to cell phones find higher risks for
comparable tumors—gliomas
and acoustic neuromas.
Yet exposures continue to increase every day in
schools and homes throughout this nation as
children are handed two-way microwave radiating
devices to use next to their young developing
bodies," stated Devra Davis PhD, MPH,
Visiting Professor of Medicine at Hebrew
University and President of Environmental Health
Trust, who added, "the Ramazzini Study
published this week in Environmental
Research found
statistically significant increases of the same
rare cancers as found in the National Toxicology
Program study, but at radiation levels
significantly lower than those of the NTP.
Combined, these two studies strengthen the case
that this radiation is a carcinogen. Cautionary
action is urgently reduce exposures for children
and the rest of us. As the chairman of our
Business Advisory Group Frank Clegg, former
President of Microsoft Canada, has advised: 'I
come from a smart industry. Tell us what we need
to do and we will get it done.'"
"This
animal evidence, together with the extensive
human evidence, coupled with the rising incidence
of brain cancers in young people in the U.S.,
conclusively confirms that radiofrequency
radiation is a Category 1 human carcinogen,"
explains Anthony Miller MD, University of Toronto
Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor
Emeritus, medical advisor to EHT, who has served
as an advisor to the World Health Organization.
"The
peer reviewers reviewed the tumor data in a
transparent scientific process. This landmark
U.S. government study, in addition to the
recently released Italian Ramazzini study,
provides the scientific evidence governments
needs to take swift action to protect the
public," said Theodora Scarato, Executive
Director of EHT who added, "The rollout of
5G small cells must be halted. Schools
need to install wired internet networks.
Communities should have maintained
landlines. Solutions exist such as ethernet and
fiber optic networks. Public Health Departments
need to initiate public awareness campaigns to
educate the public on how to reduce exposure.
People need to understand just how easy it is to
use safe wired technologies, especially at home.
Employers need to prioritize this issue and make
changes in the workplace to limit and minimize
workplace exposures. We have a responsibility to
future generations to take action on this issue
now."
NEWS
STORIES
New
Studies Link Cell Phone Radiation with Cancer,
Scientific American March 29, 2018
Can
cellphones really cause cancer?, PITTSBURGH
(KDKA)
"Can
your cellphone cause cancer? Scientists find
definitive link in study of rats" The News
and Observer March 28, 2018
About
Environmental Health Trust
Environmental
Health Trust (EHT) educates individuals, health
professionals and communities about controllable
environmental health risks and policy changes
needed to reduce those risks. Currently EHT is
raising health concerns about cell phones and
wireless in schools and recommends practical
steps to reduce exposures. The Environmental
Health Trust maintains a regularly updated
database of worldwide precautionary policies on
cell phone radiation and health. The foundation's
website is the go-to place for clear,
science-based information to prevent disease.