NEW Barrie Trower WiFi Report -
Humanity At The Brink
By Barrie Trower September8-24-13
With Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written
for all students and non-scientists to understand.
Abstract
As stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and
International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls
exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of
suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged
children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to
successive generations.


Wifi a Thalidomide in the Making Who Cares?
Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for
R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences
Advisor to the World Health Organisation, Military and University
Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of
microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:

Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages
prior to the 7
th
week of pregnancy....”(1)
The level of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from,
five microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may
seem meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is
below
what most schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi
transmitters, from the age of approximately five years upwards, this
level becomes more meaningful.
A distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls
are not women
. Schoolgirls are children and children are both
neurologically and physiologically different from adults. A child’s
brain tissue / bone marrow has different electrical conductivity
properties than adults due to the higher water content (2) (this renders
the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete
). Children’s absorption of
microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults. Permanent
low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and
oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria
(mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial
DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to
oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus).
Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein
content, therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be
transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)
Hence, we are subjecting each successive female generation to harm.
Whether these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are
additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point.
Either way we are facing the equivalent of a pandemic. I was invited to
present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor


commented on a +60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm
animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer the same
consequence resulting from low-level microwave irradiation. There is
very little difference ‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple
explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in
schoolgirls.
Simple Explanation
Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop
near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated
until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become
pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been
microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first
100 days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles
(within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the
cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your
‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and
damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes
an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its
child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously
mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development
stages.
Beyond Belief
The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented
long before wi-fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous
biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the
general public, in order to protect the industries profit.
Professor Goldsmith writes:

.....effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain


populations: reproductive effects.....increased spontaneous
abortion.....increased incidence of childhood and other
cancers.....” (1)
Confirming this with more than 2000 references is the Naval Medical
Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported
Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed
to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered
Menstrual Activity / Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’ Research
Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects and Health Hazards of
Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological effects,
health and excess mortality from artificial irradiation of Radio
Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems concerning
Reproductive Function.
This document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents withheld
by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing
Radiation Protection). (5)
Eldon Byrd, a scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US
Navy, in one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level
microwaves, is referenced as stating:

.....we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six
times higher foetus mortality and birth defects....’. (6)
Finally, the Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very
thorough and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This
industries conclusion was:
Sec. 7 “.....it can be concluded that electro-magnetic fields with
frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do
play a
role in the development of cancer.


.....Direct damage
on the DNA
as well as influences
on the
DNA synthesis
and DNA repair mechanisms
.....” (7)
(Note I have underscored the relevant words here.)

Note: DNA synthesis is essential for healthy embryonic / foetal /
child’s growth.

With these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this
phenomena; in order to protect this industries’ profit, the United States
Defence Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’ to ‘advanced nations’
describing the problem and suggesting ‘how to deceive the public’.

It read:

.....if the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the
enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be
unfavourable effects on industrial output.....exposed to
microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more.....”
(8)

NB: Industrial output is of course...profit. A very relaxed exposure
standard also makes it very difficult to take the industry to court.

This (and two other documents with ref. 8) then continues to list many
physiological and neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal,
microwave irradiation inc: blood disorders, heart problems, psychiatric
symptoms and ‘menstrual disorders’.

*Wi-fi is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.
*

In order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted
the ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just six-
minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six
minutes, wi-fi is deemed to be safe.

No consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below thermal’
cellular interaction as listed by several countries including the United
States; which were (and are) known to cause: cancer, severe
neuropathological symptoms, foetal defects and literally hundreds of
illnesses related to cellular disorders.
Countries following ICNIRP continue to argue that their six minute
warming effect is all that is required regarding microwave irradiation.

Should the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of
frogs’ and thinking ‘no government would ever harm its citizens for
money, especially pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate
Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow
disease), lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military
personnel serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent
Orange sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many
global birth defects stem from these Government / Government
Scientific / Military decisions:
with industrial advisors
.
If further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents
released under the Freedom of Information Act; namely, Operations:
Pandora, MK Ultra, MK Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK Naomi,
MK Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Sleeping Beauty and Grill
Flame.
Here, secret experiments carried out by the Military / Government
scientists upon unsuspecting civilians, namely: students, servicemen,
psychiatric patients, poor, children over the age of 4 years, pregnant
women, Muslims, Catholics, prisoners, handicapped, deaf, blind,
homosexuals, single women, elderly, school children, ‘marginal
groups’ and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge and
understanding of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.

Progress
on the study of illnesses caused by low-level microwave
irradiation continues to this day. One current study on cancer and
neurological harm continues until 2018 and involves women who
could be pregnant. (9)
Progress Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:

.....students will understand the nature of RF...bioeffects
research, including human / animal studies.....students will
become familiar with current state of knowledge on potential
health effects RF, such as cancer, memory loss, and birth
defects.” (10)

NB: RF has become a generic term (Radio Frequency) to avoid using
the term ‘microwave’. It poses less ‘safety queries’ as the word ‘radio’
itself, which used to refer to ‘long wave radio’ was domestically non-
threatening.

Intentional Ignorance
Governmental Intransigence forces a moratorium upon the risks of
exposure to future generations. Both the Communications Industry and
Governmental studies have proved that protein synthesis (the using of
chemical structures to ‘build’ the roughly 4050 foetal and 4500 adults
designated biological / neurological structures) can be influenced by
low-level microwave irradiation. This moratorium seems to spread to
organizations either relying on Governmental funding, or for whatever
reason; acquiescence. However, not all research departments suppress
the truth.
A brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that low-
level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating (thermal)
effect, can affect cellular signaling processes. (11)

The Main Risks to Children
These biological processes described as being ‘influenced’ by low-
level microwave irradiation may not just damage foetal growth; relying
on the same biological processes are:
Blood Brain Barrier requires 18 months to form and protects
the brain from toxins. It is known to be effected.
Myelin Sheath requires 22 years to build its 122 layers. It is
responsible for all thinking, organ and muscle processes.
Brain requires 20 years to develop (I can assure you, cell
phones do not help in its development).
Immune System requires 18 years to develop. Bone marrow
and Bone Density are known to be affected by low-level
microwaves as are the immune systems’ white blood cells.

Bones requires 28 years to develop as mentioned the moisture
content of children makes both the ‘soft bones’ and marrow
particularly attractive to microwave irradiation. Bone marrow
produces blood cells.

Clearly, our decision makers are overlooking a child illness pandemic
hitherto unknown in our 40,000 generations of civilization; which can
involve over a half of the World’s exposed mothers / children.

The Very Sad Truth
I have been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals,
Governments, Leaders of Governments, Leaders of Peoples and
Government Officials over the years.

My address (text) to one King concerning the numbers of ill children
was placed on the internet. (12)

I referenced over 200 cancer / leukaemia clusters in schools (up to the
time of data collection) from low level microwave transmitters in
schools. There were many different types of cancers, leukaemias,
miscarriages and breast cancers of staff. These continue, mostly only
recorded locally, to this day.

When this was discussed in the English Parliament (as one of the EU
Countries involved), a Minister dismissed it and lied to the House of
Commons. My request to prove this lie was denied.

Possibly, the most respected children’s charity in the World: UNICEF,
joined forces with the World’s leading authority on the effects of harm
from low-level microwave irradiation:

The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection: in their research document ‘Health Effect on Children and
Teenagers’ found;

85% increase in Central Nervous System Disorders
36% increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and
Risk to Foetus
. (13)

NB. The Reader may think that the cell phone irradiation is different
from wi-fi as it has more power. In fact wi-fi can be more
harmful
because of its lower power! Low power can enter the body and cause
harm. All electromagnetic waves are accumulative. If they are below

the body’s threshold to cause activation of the necessary proteins
required to defend and repair tissues, the damage accumulates very
slowly and is undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a
cloudy day, you can still burn your skin.

The Good Guys
I have a list of nine countries (some of whom I am working with) who
are actively, either taking wi-fi out of schools or in the legal argument-
stage of this process. I decline to publically name these countries as my
actions may interfere with their legal negotiations.

The Parliamentary Assembly (Assemblee Parlimentaire) Council of
Europe Document 12608, published on 6.5.2011 in section 8.3.2.
states:


.....ban
all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN
systems from classrooms and schools.....’

For legal reasons this had to be changed to a ‘wired system is
preferred’. However, the meaning is clear.

In a translated document, Professor Yuri Grigoriev of the Russian
Committee for Non Ionizing Radiation Protection wrote on 19.6.2012

.....recommend the use of wired networks and not networks
using the wireless broadband access systems, including wi-fi,
in schools and educational establishments.’

A document dated 25.3.2013 (updated from 19.3.2013) by the
Executive Committee of the American Academy of Environmental
Medicine wrote a letter to the Los Angeles Unified School District
with the following recommendation:

.....do not add to the burden of public health by installing
blanket wireless internet connections in Los Angeles Schools.’

Just prior to this in December 2012 the American Academy of
Pediatrics (representing 60,000 Paediatricians) wrote to Congress
requesting more protection from low-level microwave irradiation for
children and pregnant women: with regard to wi-fi in schools, they
write:


.....this is an unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome
on the health and reproductive potential of a generation.’ (14)

In 2002, 36,000 Physicians and Scientists etc. signed the ‘Freiburg
Appeal’. Ten years hence, it has been re-launched. It specifically warns
against the use of Wi-fi and the irradiation of children, adolescents and
pregnant women. ‘Freiburg’ is an International Doctors’ Appeal.

The Reader will appreciate that collectively there are approximately
100,000 of the World’s most knowledgeable professionals
expostulating this same warning.

As an aside, should the Reader be wondering why I have not
mentioned school-boys and whether they can be affected in a similar
way to girls: the answer is ‘yes’.

DNA sperm fragmentation from wi-fi levels of irradiation, have been
published. (15) It would require many more pages to comment upon
this phenomenon and there is already a plethora of data both available
and published.

Pulsing / Modulations
During the ‘Cold War’ conflict, whilst I was collating effects from
microwave pulses / modulations caused by brain entrainment,
resonance (both cyclotronic and circadian), rectification (at boundaries
within the body) generated by electrically induced phase transition; it
came to my attention that a list needed to be published for all
microwave communication systems. (16)
In this Open Letter, I list 1 to 40 Hz (pulses / modulations per second)
and their corresponding neurological / physiological response.
In his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy
writes.....

.....For example, Grigoriev et. Al. (2010) showed that 30 days
exposure to unmodulated 2450 MHz microwave radiation
triggered a small but significant increase in anti-brain
antibodies in the blood of rats.....which could then result in an
auto immune attack on the brain and / or nervous system. An
example of an auto immune disease of the brain is Graves
disease in which the pituitary gland (at the base of the brain) is
affected.’ (17)
NB. 2450 M Hz is the wi-fi frequency.
If you add the pulse / modulation frequency to the above; fatigue,
depression, psychiatric problems (such as anger), loss of appetite and
problems with movement can also be induced.
The Bad Guys
With gargantuan profits to be made, it is of no surprise that the English
Parliamentary system choose to follow ICNIRP and their well
established ‘Active Denial’ policy.
I became familiar with our ‘corruption’ when during the late 60’s 70’s,
I was commissioned to investigate (under a programme initiated by Sir
William Melvin (1911)) corruption within the hierarchy of the London
Metropolitan Police and the non-elected Members of the English

Parliament. Should the Reader be dismissive of such actions, I suggest
looking at any of our Sunday newspapers over the past 45 years,
including now.
When a Reverend lady wrote to a Minister, Nick Gibb MP, concerning
Wi-fi in schools, his standard reply (which I have seen many times)
stated:
“.....advice given.....by UK Health Protection Agency..... ‘There is no
consistent evidence of health effects from RF exposures below
guideline levels and no reason why schools and others should not use
Wi-fi equipment.” (18)

This letter is designed to deceive (and it is very successful). Look to
the words ‘no consistent evidence’. Let me explain please.

If I were to carry out an experiment on every single person who went
through the doors of your main airport on any busy day and told them
that they must drink one pint of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day
forever; some would react immediately, especially children. Others
would react over days, weeks, months and years (many years in some
cases). Then there would be those who would thoroughly enjoy the
experiment and probably never be ill. That does not mean that alcohol
and cigarettes are safe. It shows that people are not homogenous (all
alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion of my experiment
would be that there is: ‘no consistent evidence
’.

Other Ministerial letters usually say: “most of our research” or “most
of our scientists” both of which are equally meaningless.

What they never say is: Wi-fi is safe.

It will come as no surprise to the Reader to learn that I have been
refused permission to have a face-to-face meeting with my MP, Mr
Mel Stride. Hence my Member of Parliament has successfully brought
the ‘shutters down’ on any access I may have had to Government. This
act by Mr Stride became a ‘feature’ in our West Country newspaper by
leading Journalist Paul James. (19)

During my last attempt to contact my MP, his Secretary, Dominic just
hung-up the telephone on me.

Years ago, when I started to ‘advise caution’ re microwaving children /
pregnant women; the Academic Registrar of my own University
(Exeter) forbade me from ever communicating with it, ever again. A
similar message came from Dr. Jamie Harle of the Open University
(Medical Physics), who said: “Your work is too political.”

Clearly in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons
are more afraid of governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth.
Regardless of the consequences.

Two Womens’ Stories
The Real Price of Intentional Ignorance and Greed. Those
Consequences.

Ten telephone calls a day would not be unusual for me. I even receive
calls Christmas Day / Easter Sunday. Two calls which summarize
those from women are illustrated below. Both are actual conversations.


i.


.....my daughter had just died. I am holding her hand. She has
just had her 11
th
birthday and she was number 11 to die since
the transmitter for Wi-fi was put near her and others’ desk.....”

ii.


.....my child is one of several with cancer / birth genetic
problems. These only started after the transmitter was turned
on. My worries are two-fold and take every second of my life.
Will my child ever marry or find a partner and be happy? What
will happen when I die? I know I will die worrying. Regardless
of who is to blame, it is me, the Mother who carries guilt and
responsibility.....” (20)
I Ask for Readers’ Help, Please.

Imagine 57.7% of all of the schoolgirls with Wi-fi in their classrooms:
all day all year all through their school career, in every country using
it, in the World!

In just two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than
resulted from both World Wars. And, these are not my figures, they
come from Government advisors / research.

Advanced requests for this ‘Paper’ have been received from Royalty,
Governmental Officers (outside of the UK) and people I will describe
as ‘interesting’.

As shutters fall blocking every direction I try to turn, I ask: “Can the
Reader succeed in preventing this ‘Pandemic’ where I will fail?”

I have two requests:


i.

Would a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please ask
the British Prime Minister, face to face, why he told my MP,
Mr Stride, that he is ‘too busy’ to see me for just one hour to
discuss this issue.

ii.

If every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people
who may be able make a decision (preferably influential
women); with mathematical progression the original 100
advanced requests will soon land on a desk of somebody who
can make a difference.
International Challenge

When I am invited to speak in countries, I invariably end up on the
radio / TV news / documentary channels. Thence, I issue a challenge:

I ask for any scientist(s) from industry / government to ‘humiliate’ me
live ‘on-air’ with their expert knowledge by answering one question:


What is the safe level of microwave irradiation for the ovarian
follicles during the first 100 days development of the embryo?”

To date, not a single scientist will appear and face me.

I mention this because it is a question the Reader can ask any decision
maker, school Principal / Governor etc.

Should any person provide the answer, the next statement is:


Fine we will send it to a Leading Scientific Journal for independent
Peer Review.” (With your research). (21)

The Solution

Education need not suffer if Wi-fi is withdrawn world-wide. We have
telephone lines fibre-optic cable.

The argument against these options is the cost. Compared to the future
medical costs (forgetting the human cost), phone / fibre-cable shows to
be a very cheap option.

Thank you.

Barrie Trower
3 Flowers Meadow
Liverton
Devon TQ12 6UP
United Kingdom

In UK - 01626 821014
World 00 44 1626 821014

(This Paper is copyright free)
Epilogue
Please note I have always worked free of charge and will represent
any person in the world without cost.
PLEASE SEE ADDENDUM

Addendum Recent Publications
Professors’ / Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in
their (June 2013 Published) Paper how man-made electromagnetic
waves (as used in the communications industry) can cause interference,
hence induced oscillations, from these polarized waves. This in turn,
can induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific
Absorption Rate) obsolete.
They write:


Man-made electromagnetic waves...they are polarized...


....can produce interference effect...This induced oscillation
will be most intense on the free particles which carry a net
electric charge...a part of its energy...is transferred to the
charged / polar molecules of the medium...within biological
tissue there will be additional energy absorption by the water
dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic acids, which will also be
forced to oscillate by the applied field.


...man-made EMF’s can produce severe biological alterations
such as DNA damage without heating the biological
tissue...may lead to cancer, neurodegenerative deceases,
reproductive declines or even heritable mutations...conductivity
varies for different tissues and different field frequencies..The
relative permittivity of an adult brain is calculated to be
around 40 while the corresponding value for a young child’s
brain is between 60 and 80 resulting in almost double the
radiation absorption and SAR...


...SAR offers no information at all with respect to frequency,
waveform or modulation... (Ref (22))
Dr Dimitris Panagopoulos, Dep. of Biology, University of Athens also
writes in his 2013 paper: Electromagnetic Interaction Between
Environmental Fields and Living Systems Determines Health and Well
Being:


Disturbances in the communication between individual body
clocks can desynchronize the circadian system, which in turn
may lead to unwellness, chronic fatigue, decreased
performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric disorders, and the
development of different diseases...


...endogenous electrical balance in living organisms cannot
occur in the presence of unnatural man-made electromagnetic
pollution..... GSM mobile phone radiation is found to cause
DNA damage on insect reproductive cells (gametes) and
adversely affect reproduction for intensities down to 1
microwatt per centimetre squared after only a few minutes
exposure..... (Ref (23))